In the third example of figure 2.6, the frequency of the
wave depends only on the direction of the wave vector, independent of
its magnitude, which is just the reverse of the case for an isotropic
dispersion relation. In this case different plane waves with the same
frequency have wave vectors which point in the same direction, but
have different lengths.
More generally, one might have waves for which the frequency depends
on both the direction and magnitude of the wave vector. In
this case, two different plane waves with the same frequency would
typically have wave vectors which differed both in direction and
magnitude. Such an example is illustrated in figures 2.9
and 2.10. We now investigate the superposition of non-isotropic
waves with the same frequency.
Figure:
Wave fronts and wave vectors (
and
)
of two plane waves with different wavelengths oriented in different
directions. The slanted bands show regions of constructive
interference where wave fronts coincide. The slanted regions in
between the bars have destructive interference, and as previously,
define the lateral limits of the beams produced by the superposition.
The quantities
and
are also shown.
 |
Mathematically, we can represent the superposition of these two waves
as a generalization of equation (2.15):
![\begin{displaymath}
A = \sin [ - \Delta k_x x + (k_y + \Delta k_y ) y - \omega t ]
+ \sin [ \Delta k_x x + (k_y - \Delta k_y ) y - \omega t ] .
\end{displaymath}](img452.png) |
(3.18) |
In this equation we have given the first wave vector a
component
while the second wave vector has
. As a result, the first wave has overall wavenumber
while the
second has
, so
that
. Using the usual trigonometric identity, we write
equation (2.18) as
 |
(3.19) |
To see what this equation implies, notice that constructive
interference between the two waves occurs when
, where
is an integer. Solving this equation
for
yields
, which corresponds to lines with slope
.
These lines turn out to be perpendicular to the vector difference
between the two wave vectors,
. The easiest way to show this is to note that
this difference vector is oriented so that it has a slope
. Comparison with the
slope of the lines of constructive interference indicates that this
is so.
Figure:
Example of beams produced by two plane waves with wave vectors
differing in both direction and magnitude. The wave vectors of the
two waves are
and
. Regions of positive displacement are illustrated by vertical
hatching, while negative displacement has horizontal hatching.
 |
An example of the production of beams by the superposition of two
waves with different directions and wavelengths is shown in figure
2.10. Notice that the wavefronts are still horizontal, as
in figure 2.8, but that the beams are not vertical, but
slant to the right.
Figure:
Illustration of factors entering the addition of two plane
waves with the same frequency. The wave fronts are perpendicular to
the vector average of the two wave vectors,
, while the lines of constructive interference, which
define the beam orientation, are oriented perpendicular to the
difference between these two vectors,
.
 |
Figure 2.11 summarizes what we have learned about adding
plane waves with the same frequency. In general, the beam orientation
(and the lines of constructive interference) are not perpendicular to
the wave fronts. This only occurs when the wave frequency is
independent of wave vector direction.
David Raymond
2006-04-07