In contrast to earthly behavior, the motions of celestial objects seem
effortless. No obvious forces act to keep the planets in motion
around the sun. In fact, it appears that celestial objects simply
coast along at constant velocity unless something acts on them. The
Newtonian view of dynamics -- objects change their velocity
rather than their position when a force is exerted on them -- is
expressed by Newton's second law:
| (9.1) |
It is no wonder that the first successes of Newtonian mechanics were in the celestial realm, namely in the predictions of planetary orbits. It took Newton's genius to realize that the same principles which guided the planets also applied to the earthly realm as well. In the Newtonian view, the tendency of objects to stop when we stop pushing on them is simply a consequence of frictional forces opposing the motion. Friction, which is so important on the earth, is negligible for planetary motions, which is why Newtonian dynamics is more obviously valid for celestial bodies.
Note that the principle of relativity is closely related to Newtonian physics and is incompatible with pre-Newtonian views. After all, two reference frames moving relative to each other cannot be equivalent in the pre-Newtonian view, because objects with nothing pushing on them can only come to rest in one of the two reference frames! Einstein's relativity is often viewed as a repudiation of Newton, but this is far from the truth -- Newtonian physics makes the theory of relativity possible through its invention of the principle of relativity. Compared with the differences between pre-Newtonian and Newtonian dynamics, the changes needed to go from Newtonian to Einsteinian physics constitute minor tinkering.
David Raymond 2006-04-07